Skip to content

Explore everything

Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.

Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation A Benchmark Study of Machine Learning Models for Online Fake News DetectionComprehensive benchmark of 19 machine learning approaches across three fake news datasets (LIAR, Fake or Real News, and an 80k-news combined corpus spanning politics, health, sports, and other topics). Key finding: BERT-based pre-trained models (especially RoBERTa) substantially outperform traditional and deep learning approaches,… Khan et al. · arXiv · 2019

Detection methodsSpread & networks Tree LSTMs with Convolution Units to Predict Stance and Rumor Veracity in Social Media ConversationsProposes Tree LSTM and Binarized Constituency Tree (BCTree) LSTM architectures enhanced with convolution units to classify stance and predict rumor veracity in social media conversation threads. The approach exploits the tree structure inherent in threaded conversations (source post with nested replies) and combines it with convolutional… Kumar & Carley · 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for… · 2019

Datasets & evaluationDeepfakes & multimodal r/Fakeddit: A New Multimodal Benchmark Dataset for Fine-grained Fake News DetectionFakeddit is a large-scale multimodal fake news detection dataset with over 1 million Reddit samples labeled with 2-way, 3-way, and 6-way classification schemes. Multimodal models combining text (BERT) and image (ResNet50) features achieve 86.0% accuracy on 6-way classification, demonstrating the importance of jointly leveraging text and… Nakamura et al. · arXiv · 2019

Datasets & evaluationSpread & networks NELA-GT-2018: A Large Multi-Labelled News Dataset for The Study of Misinformation in News ArticlesNELA-GT-2018 is a large, engagement-independent collection of 713,534 news articles from 194 sources across 10 months (Feb–Nov 2018). It combines multi-source-level ground truth labels from eight independent assessment sites (NewsGuard, Pew Research, Wikipedia, OpenSources, Media Bias/Fact Check, AllSides, BuzzFeed News, PolitiFact)… Nørregaard et al. · arXiv · 2019

Deepfakes & multimodalDetection methods FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial ImagesFaceForensics++ introduces a large-scale benchmark (1.8+ million manipulated images from 1,000+ videos) for detecting facial manipulations created with four state-of-the-art methods: Face2Face, FaceSwap, DeepFakes, and NeuralTextures. The paper comprehensively evaluates detection methods from stegananalysis to deep learning,… Rössler et al. · arXiv · 2019

Deepfakes & multimodalDetection methods Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in VideosThis paper proposes using recurrent convolutional networks to detect face manipulations (Deepfake, Face2Face, FaceSwap) in videos by exploiting temporal discrepancies across frames. Face preprocessing with alignment and bidirectional recurrent networks achieve state-of-the-art on FaceForensics++ with up to 4.55% improvement over prior… Sabir et al. · arXiv · 2019

Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation Findings of the NLP4IF-2019 Shared Task on Fine-Grained Propaganda DetectionThis paper reports findings from a shared task on fine-grained propaganda detection in news articles, featuring two subtasks: fragment-level identification and classification into 18 propaganda techniques, and sentence-level binary propaganda detection. The task attracted 90 registered teams with 39 making submissions; winning systems… San Martino et al. · NLP4IF Workshop at EMNLP-IJCNLP · 2019

Bots & coordinated campaignsDatasets & evaluation Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social botsThis paper reviews social bot types, their impact on online discourse, and detection methods, then presents Botometer as a case study in how detection tools are used and interpreted by the public. The authors conducted a user experience survey (731 participants) revealing that while users find the tool useful, they struggle with… Yang et al. · arXiv · 2019

Bots & coordinated campaignsDatasets & evaluation Scalable and Generalizable Social Bot Detection through Data SelectionThis paper addresses scalability and generalization challenges in social bot detection by proposing a framework using only 20 user metadata features, enabling real-time analysis of the full Twitter stream. The key insight is that strategic data selection—training on a carefully chosen subset of 13 compiled datasets—achieves better… Yang et al. · arXiv · 2019

Bots & coordinated campaignsDeepfakes & multimodal Characterizing the Use of Images in State-Sponsored Information Warfare Operations by Russian Trolls on TwitterLarge-scale analysis of 1.8M images posted by ~3.6K Russian state-sponsored Twitter accounts (IRA-controlled). Russian trolls strategically deployed images and memes to maximize political influence, with political imagery 2+ times more effective than general content. Zannettou et al. · AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · 2019

Spread & networksDetection methods Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep LearningA graph neural network approach for fake news detection that exploits social network structure and news propagation patterns rather than content alone. The method integrates user profiles, social connections, and cascade dynamics to achieve 92.7% ROC AUC on Twitter data and can detect fake news within hours of propagation. Monti et al. · arXiv · 2019

Spread & networksDetection methods Hierarchical Propagation Networks for Fake News Detection: Investigation and ExploitationContent-only fake news detection has limited performance because fake news is deliberately crafted to mimic real news. This paper constructs hierarchical propagation networks from both macro-level (tweet/retweet cascade) and micro-level (reply conversation) granularity, extracts structural, temporal, and linguistic features from both… Shu et al. · AAAI · 2019

Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation Beyond News Contents: The Role of Social Context for Fake News DetectionContent-only detection is insufficient because fake news is crafted to mimic real news. This paper argues that the tri-relationship among publishers, news pieces, and users forms rich social context for detection: partisan-biased publishers more likely publish fake news, and low-credibility users more likely share it. Shu et al. · ACM International Conference on Web Search… · 2019

LLMs & generative AIDetection methods Defending Against Neural Fake NewsZellers et al. introduce GROVER, a conditional neural text generation model that can both generate and detect neural fake news. The paper shows that humans cannot reliably distinguish GROVER-generated propaganda from real human-written disinformation, rating machine-generated propaganda as more trustworthy (2.42/3 vs 2.19/3 for human… Zellers et al. · NeurIPS · 2019

Psychology & interventionsSpread & networks Cognitive attraction and online misinformationMisinformation spreads not because it is low-quality information constrained by digital media inefficiencies, but because it taps into general evolved cognitive preferences. A content analysis of 260 articles from 26 hoax websites shows that 86% contain at least one cognitive-appeal feature: negative framing (49%), threat descriptions… Acerbi · Palgrave Communications · 2019

Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter DataEady et al. link survey data from 1,496 Americans to Twitter data from 642,345 accounts and ~1.2 billion tweets to measure political polarization in media consumption. Rather than finding evidence of extreme "filter bubbles" where most people consume ideologically homogeneous content, they find substantial overlap in the accounts… Eady et al. · SAGE Open · 2019

Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential electionFake news consumption on Twitter during the 2016 election was extremely concentrated: only 1% of users saw 80% of exposures, and 0.1% shared 80% of fake news. Conservative-leaning, older, highly politically engaged users drove most consumption. Grinberg et al. · Science · 2019

Spread & networksPsychology & interventions Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on FacebookFake news dissemination on Facebook during the 2016 election was a rare behavior (8.5% of users shared at least one article), with clear demographic stratification: conservatives shared more articles from fake news domains (pro-Trump), but the strongest and most robust predictor was age—users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many… Guess et al. · Science Advances · 2019

Deepfakes & multimodalDetection methods MVAE: Multimodal Variational Autoencoder for Fake News DetectionThe paper proposes MVAE, a variational autoencoder that learns shared representations of text and images in social media posts to detect fake news. The model jointly trains an encoder-decoder (to discover correlations across modalities) with a binary classifier. Khattar et al. · World Wide Web Conference · 2019

Bots & coordinated campaignsPlatforms, policy & society Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three U.S. Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017This paper analyzes Russian Internet Research Agency activity across Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit from 2015–2017 using vector autoregression models on 3,126 Facebook ads, 1.9M tweets, and 12,603 Reddit posts. Key finding: Reddit activity influenced subsequent Twitter activity (a "trial balloon" effect), but the IRA's Twitter engagement… Lukito · Political Communication · 2019

Spread & networksBots & coordinated campaigns A Study of Misinformation in WhatsApp groups with a focus on the Brazilian Presidential ElectionsStudy of 130 public WhatsApp groups during the 2018 Brazilian presidential election found that 13.1% of shared links pointed to junk news sources, with 40% of links directing to YouTube—a platform used strategically to bypass platform moderation. Videos and images dominated message content (33% of all messages) and were heavily… Machado et al. · The Web Conference · 2019

Fact-checking & verificationPlatforms, policy & society Fighting Misperceptions and Doubting Journalists' Objectivity: A Review of Fact-checking LiteratureComprehensive literature review of 48 studies on political fact-checking, organized into three research areas: (1) fact-checking effectiveness for correcting misperceptions (mixed results, including backfire effects); (2) fact-checking as a profession (contested methods and reliability); (3) public opinion about fact-checking (mostly… Nieminen & Rapeli · Political Studies Review · 2019

Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society Social Media for Political Campaigns: An Examination of Trump's and Clinton's Frame Building and Its Effect on Audience EngagementThis study analyzes how Trump and Clinton's 2016 campaigns framed messages on Twitter and Facebook, and how frame type affected audience engagement. Trump relied on conflict and negative emotional frames, while Clinton used morality and positive emotional frames. Sahly et al. · Social Media + Society · 2019

Detection methodsSpread & networks dEFEND: Explainable Fake News DetectionFake news detection on social media typically focuses on content alone, but user comments and reactions provide complementary signals. This paper proposes dEFEND, a hierarchical attention neural network that jointly encodes news sentences and user comments to both detect fake news and explain why a piece of news is detected as fake by… Shu et al. · KDD 2019 · 2019