Skip to content

Explore papers

Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.

Deepfakes & multimodalDatasets & evaluation DeepfakeGenome: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake AttributionDeepfakeGenome (DFG) is a large-scale benchmark for deepfake detection and attribution covering 100 facial forgery algorithms and 2M images — 4–100× larger than prior benchmarks. The paper proposes 4 evaluation protocols using novel retrieval-based attribution metrics (mAP, Recall) instead of reject-class classification, and conducts… Wang et al. · NeurIPS 2026 · 2026

Bots & coordinated campaignsSpread & networks Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Network-Based Detection of Coordinated Disinformation Campaigns on TelegramA graph-based methodology discovers coordinated disinformation campaigns on Telegram by analyzing message-sharing patterns rather than content, requiring only structural relationships. The authors identified 55 disinformation channels and over 86,000 identical message chains spanning multiple channels, revealing a highly synchronized… Tsagkarakis et al. · SECRYPT · 2026

LLMs & generative AIFact-checking & verification VEX-Bench: Benchmarking Verification Complexity of LLM-Generated MisinformationThis paper introduces VEX-Bench, a unified benchmark for evaluating how difficult it is to verify LLM-generated misinformation. The benchmark measures verification complexity across five dimensions: checkability (whether claims can be checked), harm significance, source credibility signals, impostor legitimacy, and verification cost. Huang et al. · NeurIPS 2026, Track on Evaluations and Datasets · 2026

Bots & coordinated campaignsDatasets & evaluation Setting the clock: Evaluating temporal window parameters for coordinated behavior detectionThe paper systematically evaluates how temporal window parameters (length and stride) affect detection of coordinated communities in co-repost networks. Using 14 labeled information operation datasets, the authors find that window length is a central modeling parameter: short windows (seconds to minutes) detect tight, highly synchronized… Panayiotou et al. · AIDEM Workshop, ECML-PKDD 2026 · 2026

Datasets & evaluationDeepfakes & multimodal From Manipulation to Mistrust: Explaining Diverse Micro-Video Misinformation for Robust Debunking in the WildThe paper introduces WildFakeBench, a benchmark of 10,000+ real-world micro-videos spanning diverse misinformation types (manipulation, bias, AI-generated content, out-of-context) from six social platforms. The authors propose FakeAgent, a multi-agent reasoning framework combining neural networks and large language models, which achieves… Zeng et al. · ACM International Conference · 2026

Deepfakes & multimodalDetection methods Seeing Through Deception: Uncovering Misleading Creator Intent in Multimodal News with Vision-Language ModelsThis paper introduces DECEPTIONDECODED, a benchmark of 12,000 image-caption pairs for evaluating multimodal misinformation detection with focus on creator intent. The authors find that state-of-the-art vision-language models struggle with intent reasoning and rely on superficial cues, motivating a framework for intent-aware multimodal… Wu et al. · ICLR 2026 · 2026

LLMs & generative AIDatasets & evaluation Beyond Speculation: Measuring the Growing Presence of LLM-Generated Texts in Multilingual DisinformationThis empirical study provides the first measurement of LLM-generated content in real-world disinformation datasets. Analyzing the MultiClaim dataset (fact-checked social media posts), the authors document a 99% increase in machine-generated content from 2021 to 2023 (0.93% to 1.85%), correlating with ChatGPT's November 2022 release. Macko et al. · IEEE Computer · 2026

Spread & networksDetection methods Spectral Analysis of Fake News PropagationThe paper develops a spectral view of fake news propagation by connecting graph spectra with structural properties of propagation trees. The authors derive spectral bounds capturing five key aspects of cascade structure—branching capacity, cascade scale, structural cohesion, propagation span, and diffusion dynamics—and use them as graph… Cai & Zafarani · SIAM · 2026

Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI Bridging Thoughts and Words: Graph-Based Intent-Semantic Joint Learning for Fake News DetectionExisting fake news detectors rely on surface-level semantic patterns (emotional language, stylistic cues) and fail when writing styles shift. This paper proposes InSIDE, which combines semantic and intent signals via heterogeneous graphs: intent models the purpose behind an article (e.g., promoting a product), while semantics capture… Wang et al. · CIKM · 2025

Datasets & evaluationDetection methods A Guide to Misinformation Detection Data and EvaluationThis work surveys the largest collection of misinformation detection datasets to date (75 datasets from prior literature) and evaluates dataset quality across multiple dimensions. The authors assess whether datasets enable reliable veracity evaluation by analyzing keyword correlations, temporal correlations, and feasibility of claim… Thibault et al. · KDD '25 — 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on… · 2025

LLMs & generative AIDatasets & evaluation A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language ModelsThis survey provides a comprehensive review of evaluation methodologies for large language models across three dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate. The paper encompasses evaluation tasks spanning natural language processing, natural language generation, robustness, ethics, bias detection, trustworthiness,… Chang et al. · Journal of the ACM · 2023

LLMs & generative AIDatasets & evaluation The Looming Threat of Fake and LLM-generated LinkedIn Profiles: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection and PreventionLinkedIn's lack of verification enables fake accounts that harm legitimate users and the platform's integrity. This work introduces a dataset of 3600 profiles (legitimate, manually created fake, and ChatGPT-generated) and proposes SSTE, a method that detects fake profiles immediately after registration using only profile text. Ayoobi et al. · 3rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media · 2023

Deepfakes & multimodalDatasets & evaluation Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Literature ReviewSystematic review of 112 deepfake detection studies (2018–2020) categorizing techniques into deep learning, machine learning, statistical, and blockchain methods. Deep learning approaches (77% of studies, primarily CNNs) significantly outperform non-deep methods, achieving ~89.7% mean accuracy. Rana et al. · IEEE Access · 2022

Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic ReviewSystematic review of 69 studies examining health misinformation prevalence across social media platforms. Vaccines, drugs, and smoking are the most-studied topics; Twitter is the primary platform for misinformation about smoking and substances, while vaccines are discussed broadly across platforms. Suarez-Lledo & Alvarez-Galvez · Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2021

Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation A Survey of Information Cascade Analysis: Models, Predictions, and Recent AdvancesThis comprehensive survey systematizes research on predicting information cascade growth and structure across social networks, covering feature-based models, generative models, and deep learning approaches. It provides a taxonomy of prediction methods across temporal, structural, user/item, and content features; evaluation metrics and… Zhou et al. · ACM Computing Surveys · 2021

Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation MDFEND: Multi-domain Fake News DetectionMost fake news detection methods focus on single-domain data, which leads to poor performance across different domains due to domain shift (varying word usage and propagation patterns). This paper introduces Weibo21, the first multi-domain fake news dataset from a single platform with 9 domains, and proposes MDFEND, a model using… Nan et al. · CIKM '21: The 30th ACM International… · 2021

Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation DEAP-FAKED: Knowledge Graph based Approach for Fake News DetectionDEAP-FAKED combines a biLSTM news encoder with knowledge graph embeddings to detect fake news using only article titles. The approach extracts named entities from titles, maps them to Wikidata using named entity disambiguation, and embeds them via ComplEx. Mayank et al. · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances… · 2021

Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI FakeBERT: Fake News Detection in Social Media with a BERT-based Deep Learning ApproachFakeBERT combines BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) with parallel 1D convolutional neural networks to detect fake news on social media. The model captures semantic and long-distance dependencies in text, achieving 98.90% accuracy on the real-world fake news dataset and substantially outperforming CNN and LSTM… Kaliyar et al. · Multimedia Tools and Applications · 2021

Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI KAN: Knowledge-aware Attention Network for Fake News DetectionMost fake news detection models rely on textual features and social context but ignore knowledge-level relationships among entities in news. This paper proposes KAN, which extracts entity mentions from news, aligns them with knowledge graphs (Wikidata), and uses two attention mechanisms (N-E and N-E2C) to measure entity and… Dun et al. · AAAI 2021 · 2021

Detection methodsDeepfakes & multimodal Embracing Domain Differences in Fake News: Cross-domain Fake News Detection using Multimodal DataMost fake news detection models are trained on a single domain (e.g., politics) and fail when tested on others (e.g., entertainment, COVID-19). This paper proposes a multimodal framework that leverages both domain-specific and cross-domain knowledge to detect fake news across different domains. Silva et al. · AAAI 2021 · 2021

Spread & networksBots & coordinated campaigns On the Detection of Disinformation Campaign Activity with Network AnalysisState-sponsored disinformation campaigns on Twitter exhibit distinct coordination patterns (shared messages, hashtags, URLs, retweet cascades) that differ from legitimate coordinated activity. The paper proposes using coordination network features—extracted from daily account interactions—to train a binary classifier that detects… Vargas et al. · Cloud Computing Security Workshop · 2020

Bots & coordinated campaignsSpread & networks Uncovering Coordinated Networks on Social Media: Methods and Case StudiesThis paper proposes a general, unsupervised, network-based methodology to detect coordinated inauthentic behavior on social media. The approach identifies behavioral traces (handle changes, image sharing, hashtag sequences, co-retweets, synchronized actions) and constructs bipartite networks to discover clusters of accounts likely… Pacheco et al. · ICWSM · 2020

Datasets & evaluationDetection methods Fighting an Infodemic: COVID-19 Fake News DatasetThe authors present a manually annotated dataset of 10,700 COVID-19 related posts and articles (52% real, 48% fake) collected from social media and fact-checking websites. They benchmark four machine learning baselines (Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, SVM, Gradient Boost), achieving 93.32% F1-score with SVM, and release both the… Patwa et al. · Springer · 2020

Bots & coordinated campaignsDatasets & evaluation A Decade of Social Bot DetectionA comprehensive review of social bot detection research from 2010 to 2020, documenting the evolution from supervised individual-account detection to group-level approaches targeting coordinated inauthentic behavior. The paper traces the escalating "arms race" between bot developers and detection researchers, illustrates bots' documented… Cresci · Communications of the ACM · 2020