Explore everything
Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter DataEady et al. link survey data from 1,496 Americans to Twitter data from 642,345 accounts and ~1.2 billion tweets to measure political polarization in media consumption. Rather than finding evidence of extreme "filter bubbles" where most people consume ideologically homogeneous content, they find substantial overlap in the accounts…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential electionFake news consumption on Twitter during the 2016 election was extremely concentrated: only 1% of users saw 80% of exposures, and 0.1% shared 80% of fake news. Conservative-leaning, older, highly politically engaged users drove most consumption.
Spread & networksPsychology & interventions
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on FacebookFake news dissemination on Facebook during the 2016 election was a rare behavior (8.5% of users shared at least one article), with clear demographic stratification: conservatives shared more articles from fake news domains (pro-Trump), but the strongest and most robust predictor was age—users over 65 shared nearly seven times as many…
Bots & coordinated campaignsPlatforms, policy & society
Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three U.S. Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017This paper analyzes Russian Internet Research Agency activity across Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit from 2015–2017 using vector autoregression models on 3,126 Facebook ads, 1.9M tweets, and 12,603 Reddit posts. Key finding: Reddit activity influenced subsequent Twitter activity (a "trial balloon" effect), but the IRA's Twitter engagement…
Spread & networksBots & coordinated campaigns
A Study of Misinformation in WhatsApp groups with a focus on the Brazilian Presidential ElectionsStudy of 130 public WhatsApp groups during the 2018 Brazilian presidential election found that 13.1% of shared links pointed to junk news sources, with 40% of links directing to YouTube—a platform used strategically to bypass platform moderation. Videos and images dominated message content (33% of all messages) and were heavily…
Fact-checking & verificationPlatforms, policy & society
Fighting Misperceptions and Doubting Journalists' Objectivity: A Review of Fact-checking LiteratureComprehensive literature review of 48 studies on political fact-checking, organized into three research areas: (1) fact-checking effectiveness for correcting misperceptions (mixed results, including backfire effects); (2) fact-checking as a profession (contested methods and reliability); (3) public opinion about fact-checking (mostly…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Social Media for Political Campaigns: An Examination of Trump's and Clinton's Frame Building and Its Effect on Audience EngagementThis study analyzes how Trump and Clinton's 2016 campaigns framed messages on Twitter and Facebook, and how frame type affected audience engagement. Trump relied on conflict and negative emotional frames, while Clinton used morality and positive emotional frames.
Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society
Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformationThis large-scale empirical study demonstrates that a free ~15-minute online browser game teaching six common misinformation production techniques (polarisation, emotional manipulation, conspiracy theories, trolling, discrediting opponents, impersonation) significantly reduces perceived reliability of misinformation across N=15,000…
Psychology & interventionsFact-checking & verification
Why People Believe Fake News, Myths & Conspiracy TheoriesBrendan Nyhan surveys research on why people hold false beliefs about politics, health, and conspiracy theories despite exposure to corrective information. He identifies two core mechanisms: selective exposure (people seek out information matching their worldview) and selective acceptance (people dismiss contradictory information through…
Psychology & interventionsDetection methods
How technology can fight extremism and online harassmentYasmin Green, head of Jigsaw, presents two technological interventions addressing online harms rooted in human psychology. For radicalization: the "Redirect Method" (piloted 2016) uses online advertising to intercept users searching for extremist content (e.g., "How do I join ISIS?") and show them counter-propaganda videos from credible…
Spread & networksDeepfakes & multimodal
Don't Blame Bots, Fake News Is Spread by HumansA comprehensive talk covering the scale of misinformation campaigns on social media (ranging from Syrian hackers compromising the AP's Twitter account to Russian interference in the 2016 US election), empirical findings on how false news spreads faster than truth, and emerging threats from synthetic media (deepfakes) created via…
Platforms, policy & societyDeepfakes & multimodal
The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and MitigationA landmark 2018 report surveying the landscape of potential security threats from malicious uses of AI across three domains—digital, physical, and political security. The work proposes frameworks for forecasting AI-enabled attacks, identifies specific threat scenarios including AI-generated disinformation and deepfakes, and recommends…
Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation
Comparative Studies of Detecting Abusive Language on TwitterConducts the first comprehensive benchmark of traditional machine learning and neural network models on the Hate and Abusive Speech on Twitter dataset (100K tweets). Bidirectional GRU networks with Latent Topic Clustering achieve the best performance (0.805 F1), outperforming traditional methods like logistic regression and SVM.
Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society
Hate Lingo: A Target-based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social MediaThis paper presents the first large-scale linguistic and psycholinguistic analysis of hate speech categorized by its target: directed (personal attacks) versus generalized (targeting groups). The authors analyze 28,318 directed and ~2,500 generalized hate tweets, revealing that directed hate is more informal, angry, and explicitly…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Combating Fake News with Interpretable News Feed AlgorithmsThis position paper reviews fake news detection methods and argues that news feed algorithms are insufficiently transparent, enabling echo chambers and filter bubbles that amplify misinformation. The authors propose interpretable and explainable news feed algorithms as a solution, positioning transparency and user awareness as critical…
Spread & networksDetection methods
Studying Fake News via Network Analysis: Detection and MitigationThis chapter surveys network-based approaches to fake news detection and mitigation on social media, organizing fake news dissemination along three dimensions (content, social, temporal) and introduces methods exploiting network structure: homogeneous networks (friendship, diffusion, credibility) and heterogeneous networks (knowledge,…
Bots & coordinated campaignsPlatforms, policy & society
Disinformation Warfare: Understanding State-Sponsored Trolls on Twitter and Their Influence on the WebLarge-scale empirical study of 2.7K Russian state-sponsored troll accounts and 27K tweets (Jan 2016–Sep 2017) reveals minimal direct Twitter influence but significant content amplification through RT news outlet. Trolls actively target political events, adopt multiple identities, concentrate geographically in USA/Germany/Eastern Europe,…
Bots & coordinated campaignsSpread & networks
Who Let The Trolls Out? Towards Understanding State-Sponsored TrollsComparative analysis of 934 Russian and 770 Iranian state-sponsored trolls across Twitter and Reddit (10M posts) reveals distinct operational patterns: Russian trolls prioritized URL amplification (retweets, mentions) and pro-Trump messaging; Iranian trolls pursued regional and anti-Trump narratives motivated by real-world events. Both…
Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation
The Web of False Information: Rumors, Fake News, Hoaxes, Clickbait, and Various Other ShenanigansComprehensive typology of the false information ecosystem on the Web, identifying eight types of false information (fabricated stories, propaganda, conspiracy theories, hoaxes, biased news, rumors, clickbait, satire), twelve actor categories (bots, criminal organizations, activists, governments, paid posters, journalists, useful idiots,…
Platforms, policy & societyFact-checking & verification
The Science of Fake NewsThis multidisciplinary review establishes a scientific framework for studying fake news, defining it as fabricated information that mimics news media form but lacks editorial norms. The paper identifies two mitigation strategies—empowering individuals through fact-checking and education, and structural platform interventions—while…
Spread & networksBots & coordinated campaigns
Anatomy of an online misinformation networkA network analysis of misinformation and fact-checking spread during the 2016 US Presidential Election reveals stark segregation between the two communities on Twitter. The core of the network is dominated by misinformation spreaders; fact-checking nearly disappears in the densest regions.
Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation
Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation TechniquesThis comprehensive survey of fake news detection and mitigation organizes existing methods into two broad categories: content-based approaches (linguistic and deep learning methods) and feedback-based approaches (exploiting propagation patterns, user responses, and temporal dynamics). The authors consolidate 23+ publicly available…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarizationThis field experiment tested whether exposure to opposing political views on social media reduces polarization. Twitter users (Republicans and Democrats) were randomly offered money to follow bots retweeting messages from opposing politicians and opinion leaders for one month.
Spread & networksPsychology & interventions
The small, disloyal fake news audience: The role of audience availability in fake news consumptionContrary to claims that fake news has reached a broad audience, this empirical analysis of comScore data shows the fake news audience is small and comprises heavy internet users. Applying the Law of Double Jeopardy from media theory, the authors show that fake news attracts disloyal audiences disproportionately from social platforms.