Skip to content

Explore everything

Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.

Datasets & evaluationSpread & networks Sampling the News Producers: A Large News and Feature Data Set for the Study of the Complex Media LandscapeIntroduces NELA2017, a dataset of 1,586 news articles from 92 diverse news sources over 7 months (April–October 2017), including mainstream outlets, hyper-partisan sources, satire, and deliberately false news sites. Computes 130 content-based linguistic and engagement features on each article, enabling large-scale comparative analysis of… Horne et al. · ICWSM 2018 · 2018

Detection methodsFact-checking & verification All-in-one: Multi-task Learning for Rumour VerificationThis paper proposes a multi-task learning framework for rumor verification that jointly trains veracity classification (the main task) with auxiliary tasks—rumor detection and stance classification. The approach outperforms single-task baselines on both RumourEval and PHEME datasets, demonstrating that sharing representations across… Kochkina et al. · arXiv · 2018

Fact-checking & verificationDetection methods DeClareE: Debunking Fake News and False Claims using Evidence-Aware Deep LearningDeClareE is an end-to-end neural network for evidence-aware credibility assessment of arbitrary natural-language claims. The model combines claim and evidence article representations using bidirectional LSTMs with claim-specific attention, automatically discovering which web articles support or refute a claim without hand-crafted… Popat et al. · arXiv · 2018

Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation FEVER: A Large-Scale Dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationThis paper introduces FEVER, a large-scale dataset of 185,445 human-verified claims with Wikipedia evidence for training fact verification systems. Claims are generated from Wikipedia and labeled as SUPPORTED, REFUTED, or NOT ENOUGH INFO; the paper presents a three-stage baseline pipeline (document retrieval, sentence selection, textual… Thorne et al. · arXiv · 2018

Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared TaskThis paper presents results of the first FEVER shared task competition, which challenged 23 teams to classify whether human-written factoid claims could be SUPPORTED or REFUTED using evidence retrieved from Wikipedia. The best system achieved 64.21% FEVER score, demonstrating the difficulty of joint evidence retrieval and natural… Thorne et al. · ACL 2018 Shared Task · 2018

Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media: A SurveyComprehensive survey of rumour detection and resolution in social media covering the entire pipeline: rumour definition and characterization, data collection strategies, annotation schemes, detection approaches for both emerging and long-standing rumours, tracking of rumour propagation, stance classification (support/deny/query/comment),… Zubiaga et al. · ACM Computing Surveys · 2018

Platforms, policy & societyFact-checking & verification The Science of Fake NewsThis multidisciplinary review establishes a scientific framework for studying fake news, defining it as fabricated information that mimics news media form but lacks editorial norms. The paper identifies two mitigation strategies—empowering individuals through fact-checking and education, and structural platform interventions—while… Lazer et al. · Science · 2018

Fact-checking & verificationPsychology & interventions Claim Ranking in Political DebatesEarly work framing check-worthiness as claim ranking; introduces the notion of "importance weighting" for prioritizing claims for fact-checking in political debates. Foundational for understanding which claims warrant verification effort. Hassan · EMNLP · 2017 Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation ClaimBuster: The first end-to-end fact-checking systemFoundational work introducing ClaimBuster, an end-to-end automated fact-checking system. Introduces a dataset of 23,533 human-annotated U.S. debate statements with check-worthiness labels, establishing baselines for automated claim check-worthiness detection and ranking. Hassan · VLDB · 2017

Spread & networksFact-checking & verification Leveraging the Crowd to Detect and Reduce the Spread of Fake News and MisinformationOnline social networks use crowd-powered flagging to identify misinformation: when users flag a story, enough flags trigger fact-checking, which disputes false claims. This paper formulates the problem of deciding which stories to fact-check and when, subject to limited fact-checking resources, as a stochastic optimal control problem. Kim et al. · arXiv · 2017

Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation Finding Streams in Knowledge Graphs to Support Fact CheckingKnowledge Stream (KS) is an unsupervised network-flow approach for computational fact-checking that treats a knowledge graph as a flow network. For a triple (subject, predicate, object), KS finds multiple paths connecting subject to object and uses edge capacities (based on relational similarity and node specificity) to compute a truth… Shiralkar et al. · arXiv · 2017

Datasets & evaluationFact-checking & verification Liar, Liar Pants on Fire: A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News DetectionThis paper introduces LIAR, a benchmark dataset of 12,836 manually labeled short statements from POLITIFACT.COM spanning 2007–2016, addressing the critical lack of labeled data for fake news detection. Each statement is annotated with fine-grained veracity labels (pants-fire, false, barely-true, half-true, mostly-true, true) and rich… Wang · arXiv · 2017

Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumoursRumourEval is a shared task benchmark for detecting and verifying rumours in social media. It introduces two subtasks: (a) stance classification (SDQC: Support/Deny/Query/Comment) of replies to rumourous claims, and (b) veracity prediction (true/false) of source tweets. Derczynski et al. · 11th International Workshop on Semantic… · 2017

Detection methodsFact-checking & verification Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-CheckingThis paper performs a linguistic analysis of fake news across four categories—satire, hoaxes, propaganda, and trusted news—using lexical features (LIWC, subjectivity, hedging, intensifiers). Experiments show that fake news articles use more first-person pronouns, exaggerative language (superlatives, modal adverbs), and hedging, while… Rashkin et al. · 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in… · 2017

Platforms, policy & societyFact-checking & verification Defining "Fake News": A typology of scholarly definitionsThis paper reviews 34 academic studies (2003–2017) that use the term "fake news" and proposes a unified typology based on two dimensions: level of facticity (reliance on facts) and author's intention to deceive. The typology identifies six distinct types—satire, parody, fabrication, manipulation, advertising, and propaganda—clarifying… Tandoc et al. · Digital Journalism · 2017

Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate ChangeLarge-scale experiments (N=2,167) demonstrate that misinformation about scientific consensus on climate change nullifies the effect of consensus messaging. Pre-emptive inoculation—warning people about misleading tactics and providing refutations—preserves two-thirds of the consensus effect. van der Linden et al. · Global Challenges · 2017

Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influencePre-emptively exposing people to flawed arguments before they encounter misinformation (inoculation) reduces that misinformation's influence. Two experiments tested this on climate change: false-balance media coverage (equal weight to consensus vs. contrarian scientists) and fake-expert arguments (using unqualified scientists to… Cook et al. · PLOS ONE · 2017

Datasets & evaluationFact-checking & verification Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on TwitterThis paper compares hate speech detection systems trained on expert annotations (from feminist and anti-racism activists) versus amateur annotations (crowdsourced via CrowdFlower) on 6,909 tweets. Systems trained on expert annotations significantly outperform those trained on amateur data, and amateur annotators systematically label more… Waseem · 2016 EMNLP Workshop on Natural Language… · 2016

Fact-checking & verificationPlatforms, policy & society Boundaries Not Drawn: Mapping the institutional roots of the global fact-checking movementGraves maps the institutional landscape of 64+ fact-checking organizations globally across two summits (2014–2015), using ethnographic fieldwork and ternary plots to sort organizations along three axes: journalism, academia, and politics/civil society. The movement has a journalistic core but exhibits striking institutional diversity and… Graves · Journalism Studies · 2016

Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation Computational fact checking from knowledge networksThis paper proposes a computational approach to fact checking by framing it as a network problem on knowledge graphs. The method finds the shortest path between entities in Wikipedia's knowledge graph using semantic proximity metrics that account for entity generality. Ciampaglia et al. · arXiv · 2015

Platforms, policy & societyPsychology & interventions In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social MediaThis study tests whether Facebook's "related stories" feature can correct misinformation by exposing users to debunking information. Two experiments (students and Mechanical Turk workers) examined vaccine-autism and GMO-illness misperceptions. Bode & Vraga · Journal of Communication · 2015

Detection methodsFact-checking & verification Fact Checking: Task definition and dataset constructionThis paper introduces fact-checking as a formal computational task: assessing the truthfulness of political claims as an ordinal classification problem with five labels (TRUE, MOSTLYTRUE, HALFTRUE, MOSTLYFALSE, FALSE). The authors construct a dataset of 106 objectively-verifiable fact-checked statements from PolitiFact and Channel 4 (out… Vlachos & Riedel · ACL 2014 Workshop on Language Technologies… · 2014

Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation Rumor CascadesFriggeri et al. tracked thousands of rumors on Facebook using Snopes.com as ground truth, finding that rumor cascades run deeper in the social network than typical content. True rumors spread more virally than false ones despite false rumors being more frequently uploaded; Snopes fact-checks increase deletion likelihood for false rumors… Friggeri et al. · Eighth International AAAI Conference on… · 2014

Fact-checking & verificationPsychology & interventions How to separate fact and fiction onlineMarkham Nolan, editor of Storyful, explains how journalists use open-source intelligence tools to verify content in the age of information overload. Through real-world case studies—including fake Hurricane Sandy photos and identifying locations in Syrian conflict videos—he demonstrates that truth-seeking requires human judgment combined… Nolan · 2012