Skip to content

Explore papers

Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.

174 results
CardsList
LLMs & generative AIDeepfakes & multimodal A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPTThis is the first comprehensive survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) covering the history, techniques, and applications of generative models from GANs through ChatGPT. It addresses both the impressive capabilities of these models (text, image, audio, video generation) and critical concerns including factuality, security, privacy, and… Cao et al. · J. ACM, Vol. 37, No. 4 · 2023 LLMs & generative AIDatasets & evaluation The Looming Threat of Fake and LLM-generated LinkedIn Profiles: Challenges and Opportunities for Detection and PreventionLinkedIn's lack of verification enables fake accounts that harm legitimate users and the platform's integrity. This work introduces a dataset of 3600 profiles (legitimate, manually created fake, and ChatGPT-generated) and proposes SSTE, a method that detects fake profiles immediately after registration using only profile text. Ayoobi et al. · 3rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media · 2023 LLMs & generative AIDetection methods DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureThis paper identifies that text sampled from language models tends to occupy negative-curvature regions of the model's log-probability landscape, whereas human-written text occupies more neutral regions. DetectGPT leverages this observation to detect machine-generated text in a zero-shot manner by analyzing probability curvature, without… Mitchell et al. · 40th International Conference on Machine… · 2023 Spread & networksDetection methods "This is Fake! Shared it by Mistake": Assessing the Intent of Fake News SpreadersThis work is the first to systematically assess whether individuals spread fake news intentionally or unintentionally. The authors propose an influence graph that captures psychological (internal) and social (external) factors driving unintentional spreading, validate it on two datasets with manually-annotated spreader intent, and… Zhou et al. · ACM Web Conference 2022 · 2022 LLMs & generative AIDetection methods All the News That's Fit to Fabricate: AI-Generated Text as a Tool of Media MisinformationThree experiments investigate whether AI-generated news text can be credible and influence public opinion. The authors find that GPT-2 models (355M to 1.5B parameters) generate text nearly indistinguishable from human-written baseline news, particularly when politically congruent stories are paired with partisan audiences. Kreps et al. · Journal of Experimental Political Science · 2022 Platforms, policy & societyDetection methods A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender SystemsRecommender systems, while beneficial to users, can amplify harmful content, introduce discrimination, and enable adversarial attacks. This survey provides a comprehensive framework for trustworthy recommender systems across six critical dimensions: Safety & Robustness (defense against adversarial attacks), Non-discrimination & Fairness… Fan et al. · ACM Computing Surveys · 2022 Deepfakes & multimodalDatasets & evaluation Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Literature ReviewSystematic review of 112 deepfake detection studies (2018–2020) categorizing techniques into deep learning, machine learning, statistical, and blockchain methods. Deep learning approaches (77% of studies, primarily CNNs) significantly outperform non-deep methods, achieving ~89.7% mean accuracy. Rana et al. · IEEE Access · 2022 Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society Right-Wing YouTube: A Supply and Demand PerspectiveYouTube has become the dominant platform for right-wing political content in the US, driven by supply-side affordances (low creation barriers, monetization, algorithmic recommendation) and demand-side audience appetite for alternative media. Using longitudinal analysis of creator clusters (Conservative, Alt-Lite, Alt-Right), the authors… Munger & Phillips · The International Journal of Press/Politics · 2022 Psychology & interventionsFact-checking & verification The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correctionThis comprehensive review establishes that misinformation's power lies not in exposure but in how cognitive, social, and affective factors shape belief formation and persist even after correction. False beliefs arise from intuitive thinking, memory failures, emotional content, in-group bias, and source credibility judgments; corrections… Ecker et al. · Nature Reviews Psychology · 2022 Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USARandomized controlled trial on 8,001 respondents (4,000 UK, 4,001 USA) measuring causal impact of exposure to COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Exposure to misinformation reduced vaccination intent by 6.2 percentage points in the UK and 6.4 in the USA relative to exposure to factual information. Loomba et al. · Nature Human Behaviour · 2021 Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic ReviewSystematic review of 69 studies examining health misinformation prevalence across social media platforms. Vaccines, drugs, and smoking are the most-studied topics; Twitter is the primary platform for misinformation about smoking and substances, while vaccines are discussed broadly across platforms. Suarez-Lledo & Alvarez-Galvez · Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2021 Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation onlineThe paper shows through six online experiments and a Twitter field trial that simply drawing people's attention to accuracy can substantially reduce their sharing of misinformation. When asked to rate the accuracy of headlines before deciding whether to share them, participants share more accurate content; a Twitter field experiment… Pennycook et al. · Nature · 2021 Deepfakes & multimodalDetection methods Multimodal Emergent Fake News Detection via Meta Neural Process NetworksExisting fake news detectors trained on labeled data perform poorly on novel, emergent events due to domain shift. The paper proposes MetaFEND, which combines meta-learning and neural processes to leverage a handful of labeled posts from a new event to quickly adapt a detection model. Wang et al. · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery… · 2021 Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation A Survey of Information Cascade Analysis: Models, Predictions, and Recent AdvancesThis comprehensive survey systematizes research on predicting information cascade growth and structure across social networks, covering feature-based models, generative models, and deep learning approaches. It provides a taxonomy of prediction methods across temporal, structural, user/item, and content features; evaluation metrics and… Zhou et al. · ACM Computing Surveys · 2021 Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic ReviewThis systematic review of 69 studies characterizes health misinformation topics and their prevalence across social media platforms. Health misinformation was most prevalent on Twitter regarding smoking and drugs; vaccines, noncommunicable diseases, and pandemics were also common topics. Suarez-Lledo & Alvarez-Galvez · Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2021 Spread & networksPsychology & interventions The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical InformationThis paper systematically studies the QAnon conspiracy theory by collecting and analyzing 4,961 unique Q drops from six aggregation sites. The authors find that aggregation sites show poor agreement on what constitutes a canonical Q drop, that Q drops are incoherent and low-quality relative to other social media platforms, and that… Papasavva et al. · 16th International AAAI Conference on Web and… · 2021 Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation MDFEND: Multi-domain Fake News DetectionMost fake news detection methods focus on single-domain data, which leads to poor performance across different domains due to domain shift (varying word usage and propagation patterns). This paper introduces Weibo21, the first multi-domain fake news dataset from a single platform with 9 domains, and proposes MDFEND, a model using… Nan et al. · CIKM '21: The 30th ACM International… · 2021 Platforms, policy & societyBots & coordinated campaigns The Threat of Offensive AI to OrganizationsA comprehensive survey identifying 33 offensive AI capabilities that adversaries can use to attack organizations, organized into seven categories: automation, campaign resilience, credential theft, exploit development, information gathering, social engineering, and stealth. Through a user study with 22 experts from academia and industry,… Mirsky et al. · ACM Computing Surveys · 2021 Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation DEAP-FAKED: Knowledge Graph based Approach for Fake News DetectionDEAP-FAKED combines a biLSTM news encoder with knowledge graph embeddings to detect fake news using only article titles. The approach extracts named entities from titles, maps them to Wikidata using named entity disambiguation, and embeds them via ComplEx. Mayank et al. · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances… · 2021 Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI FakeBERT: Fake News Detection in Social Media with a BERT-based Deep Learning ApproachFakeBERT combines BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) with parallel 1D convolutional neural networks to detect fake news on social media. The model captures semantic and long-distance dependencies in text, achieving 98.90% accuracy on the real-world fake news dataset and substantially outperforming CNN and LSTM… Kaliyar et al. · Multimedia Tools and Applications · 2021 Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI Towards Fine-Grained Reasoning for Fake News DetectionThe paper proposes FinerFact, a framework for fake news detection that models reasoning at the claim-evidence level rather than the document level. It constructs claim-evidence graphs and uses mutual-reinforcement-based ranking to identify salient evidence, then applies a bi-channel kernel graph network to reason over evidence groups. Jin et al. · ACL · 2021 Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI KAN: Knowledge-aware Attention Network for Fake News DetectionMost fake news detection models rely on textual features and social context but ignore knowledge-level relationships among entities in news. This paper proposes KAN, which extracts entity mentions from news, aligns them with knowledge graphs (Wikidata), and uses two attention mechanisms (N-E and N-E2C) to measure entity and… Dun et al. · AAAI 2021 · 2021 Detection methodsSpread & networks User Preference-aware Fake News DetectionProposes UPFD, which detects fake news by jointly modeling user endogenous preferences (from historical posts) and exogenous context (news propagation graphs) via GNNs. Shows confirmation bias drives news sharing decisions, and historical user behavior provides complementary signals to improve detection over content-only and graph-only… Dou et al. · SIGIR 2021 · 2021 Spread & networksDetection methods Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social MediaThe paper addresses the fundamental causal question: what user attributes cause susceptibility to share fake news? Rather than observing correlations, the authors use inverse propensity scoring (IPS) to learn unbiased embeddings of fake news sharing behavior, treating these embeddings as confounders in a causal model. Cheng et al. · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery… · 2021