Explore everything
Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.
LLMs & generative AIPlatforms, policy & society
Truthful AI: Developing and Governing AI That Does Not LieAs AI systems become more capable and widely deployed, strategic falsehoods—"lies" that AI generates to achieve specified objectives—pose increasing risks. This paper proposes a framework of truthfulness standards for AI systems, governance mechanisms to enforce them (including certification bodies and verification procedures), and…
Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation
A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation IdentificationComprehensive survey of stance detection for misinformation and disinformation. Stance detection—determining whether a text supports, denies, questions, or merely comments on a claim—plays dual roles: as a standalone fact-checking tool and as a component in broader verification pipelines.
Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI
Towards Fine-Grained Reasoning for Fake News DetectionThe paper proposes FinerFact, a framework for fake news detection that models reasoning at the claim-evidence level rather than the document level. It constructs claim-evidence graphs and uses mutual-reinforcement-based ranking to identify salient evidence, then applies a bi-channel kernel graph network to reason over evidence groups.
Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI
FakeBERT: Fake News Detection in Social Media with a BERT-based Deep Learning ApproachFakeBERT combines BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) with parallel 1D convolutional neural networks to detect fake news on social media. The model captures semantic and long-distance dependencies in text, achieving 98.90% accuracy on the real-world fake news dataset and substantially outperforming CNN and LSTM…
LLMs & generative AIDatasets & evaluation
TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsIntroduces TruthfulQA, a benchmark of 817 questions across 38 categories designed to measure whether language models generate truthful answers. Tests GPT-3, GPT-Neo/J, GPT-2, and T5-based models, finding that larger models are less truthful—an inverse scaling phenomenon where the best model (GPT-3-175B) achieves only 58% truthfulness…
Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation
DEAP-FAKED: Knowledge Graph based Approach for Fake News DetectionDEAP-FAKED combines a biLSTM news encoder with knowledge graph embeddings to detect fake news using only article titles. The approach extracts named entities from titles, maps them to Wikidata using named entity disambiguation, and embeds them via ComplEx.
Platforms, policy & societyBots & coordinated campaigns
The Threat of Offensive AI to OrganizationsA comprehensive survey identifying 33 offensive AI capabilities that adversaries can use to attack organizations, organized into seven categories: automation, campaign resilience, credential theft, exploit development, information gathering, social engineering, and stealth. Through a user study with 22 experts from academia and industry,…
Fact-checking & verificationDatasets & evaluation
A Survey on Predicting the Factuality and the Bias of News MediaSurvey of media-level profiling methods for predicting news outlet factuality and political bias. Rather than checking individual claims or articles, the approach profiles entire news sources to enable early detection of unreliable content at publication time.
Detection methodsDatasets & evaluation
MDFEND: Multi-domain Fake News DetectionMost fake news detection methods focus on single-domain data, which leads to poor performance across different domains due to domain shift (varying word usage and propagation patterns). This paper introduces Weibo21, the first multi-domain fake news dataset from a single platform with 9 domains, and proposes MDFEND, a model using…
Spread & networksPsychology & interventions
The Gospel According to Q: Understanding the QAnon Conspiracy from the Perspective of Canonical InformationThis paper systematically studies the QAnon conspiracy theory by collecting and analyzing 4,961 unique Q drops from six aggregation sites. The authors find that aggregation sites show poor agreement on what constitutes a canonical Q drop, that Q drops are incoherent and low-quality relative to other social media platforms, and that…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic ReviewThis systematic review of 69 studies characterizes health misinformation topics and their prevalence across social media platforms. Health misinformation was most prevalent on Twitter regarding smoking and drugs; vaccines, noncommunicable diseases, and pandemics were also common topics.
Detection methodsLLMs & generative AI
Hierarchical Multi-head Attentive Network for Evidence-aware Fake News DetectionThe paper proposes MAC, a hierarchical multi-head attention network that jointly learns word-level and document-level attention for fact-checking textual claims against evidence from external sources. Multi-head attention mechanisms capture different semantic aspects of claims and evidence documents, enabling the model to focus on…
Spread & networksDatasets & evaluation
A Survey of Information Cascade Analysis: Models, Predictions, and Recent AdvancesThis comprehensive survey systematizes research on predicting information cascade growth and structure across social networks, covering feature-based models, generative models, and deep learning approaches. It provides a taxonomy of prediction methods across temporal, structural, user/item, and content features; evaluation metrics and…
Detection methodsDeepfakes & multimodal
Embracing Domain Differences in Fake News: Cross-domain Fake News Detection using Multimodal DataMost fake news detection models are trained on a single domain (e.g., politics) and fail when tested on others (e.g., entertainment, COVID-19). This paper proposes a multimodal framework that leverages both domain-specific and cross-domain knowledge to detect fake news across different domains.
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
The echo chamber effect on social mediaComparative analysis of 100+ million posts across Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Gab on controversial topics shows echo chambers operate differently by platform: Facebook and Twitter exhibit strong homophilic clustering and polarized information diffusion, while Reddit and Gab show single-sided communities without the biased diffusion…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTubeLarge-scale study of 309,813 U.S. users' YouTube and web browsing from 2016–2019 finds that news consumption on YouTube is dominated by mainstream, centrist sources. While far-right content exists and engages users intensely, it remains a small and stable share.
Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society
Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don'tA survey of 1,299 U.S. citizens tests whether four types of media literacy—media, information, news, and digital—predict ability to identify fake news. Only information literacy (the ability to search and evaluate verified sources) significantly improves fake news identification; media, news, and digital literacies showed no significant…
Psychology & interventionsSpread & networks
Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on TwitterHigh scorers on the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT)—a measure of analytical thinking—are more discerning social media users: they follow fewer accounts, share news from more reliable sources, and engage more with substantive topics like politics. The study identifies "cognitive echo chambers" where low-CRT users preferentially follow…
Spread & networksPsychology & interventions
Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experimentA Twitter field experiment with bot accounts reveals that shared partisanship causally drives social tie formation: users were nearly three times more likely to reciprocally follow accounts matching their political party, regardless of the account's partisan intensity. Critically, this preference was symmetric—Democrats and Republicans…
Psychology & interventionsSpread & networks
News literacy, social media behaviors, and skepticism toward information on social mediaA national survey of 788 Americans examines how news literacy relates to what people see and share on social media, and whether it predicts skepticism toward information shared in these spaces. The key finding: people with higher news literacy see and post less political content on social media, but when they do engage, they're…
Detection methodsFact-checking & verification
Generating Fact Checking ExplanationsThis paper presents the first study on automatically generating explanations for fact-checking veracity predictions. The authors show that jointly optimizing both veracity classification and explanation generation improves system performance.
Fact-checking & verificationPlatforms, policy & society
Types, Sources, and Claims of COVID-19 MisinformationSystematic analysis of 225 fact-checked COVID-19 misinformation pieces reveals that most false content reconfigures existing information (59%) rather than fabricating entirely new claims. Public authorities are cited in 39% of misinformation, yet top-down claims from politicians and celebrities account for only 20% of volume but drive…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Assessing the risks of 'infodemics' in response to COVID-19 epidemicsAnalysis of 112+ million geolocated Twitter messages about COVID-19 (January–March 2020) across 64 languages and countries. Develops an infodemic risk index (IRI) measuring exposure to unreliable news; demonstrates that waves of unreliable information precede pandemic waves, providing early-warning signals for policy intervention.
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US electionUsing combined survey and web-traffic data from the 2016 US presidential election, Guess et al. found that while 44.3% of Americans aged 18+ visited an untrustworthy website during the campaign, actual exposure was highly concentrated among Trump supporters (56.7% of Trump supporters vs. 27.7% of Clinton supporters). Facebook played a…