Explore papers
Filter by research area, year and venue. Every filter is in the address bar, so you can share a view as a link.
Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate ChangeLarge-scale experiments (N=2,167) demonstrate that misinformation about scientific consensus on climate change nullifies the effect of consensus messaging. Pre-emptive inoculation—warning people about misleading tactics and providing refutations—preserves two-thirds of the consensus effect.
Platforms, policy & societyFact-checking & verification
Defining "Fake News": A typology of scholarly definitionsThis paper reviews 34 academic studies (2003–2017) that use the term "fake news" and proposes a unified typology based on two dimensions: level of facticity (reliance on facts) and author's intention to deceive. The typology identifies six distinct types—satire, parody, fabrication, manipulation, advertising, and propaganda—clarifying…
Bots & coordinated campaignsPlatforms, policy & society
Detecting Bots on Russian Political TwitterAutomated Twitter accounts (bots) represent 50% of activity in Russian political discourse. Using supervised ensemble classifiers on 3.8M accounts and 18M tweets from 2014–2015, the authors achieve 95% precision in detecting bots while maintaining 75% recall.
Spread & networksPsychology & interventions
Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in "Post-Fact" SocietyThis paper explores how spectacle—media constructs outside ordinary routine that capitalize on polarization—spreads through digital culture during the 2016 U.S. election. Using the Pizzagate conspiracy theory as a case study, the authors argue that citizen-driven spectacle leverages homophilous networks, memes, and appropriated cultural…
Psychology & interventions
The Psychology of Conspiracy TheoriesPeople are drawn to conspiracy theories via three distinct psychological motives: epistemic (seeking understanding and certainty), existential (seeking control and security), and social (maintaining positive self and group image). However, experimental evidence suggests conspiracy theories ultimately frustrate rather than satisfy these…
Spread & networksPsychology & interventions
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networksMoral-emotional language (words combining moral and emotional content) increases message diffusion in social networks by ~20% per word. This effect is stronger within political in-groups than out-groups, explaining how moral and political ideas spread within polarized "echo chambers" on platforms like Twitter.
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy MakingThis Council of Europe report introduces a comprehensive framework for understanding "information disorder" via three types (mis-, dis-, mal-information) defined by falseness and intent-to-harm. It examines the agents, messages, and interpreters involved, the creation-production-distribution lifecycle, and proposes 34 recommendations…
Spread & networksBots & coordinated campaigns
The Spread of True and False News OnlineAnalyzes 126,000 verified true and false news cascades from Twitter (2006–2017) covering 3 million users and 4.5 million shares. False news diffuses significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than truth across all categories, with false political news spreading fastest.
Psychology & interventionsPlatforms, policy & society
Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influencePre-emptively exposing people to flawed arguments before they encounter misinformation (inoculation) reduces that misinformation's influence. Two experiments tested this on climate change: false-balance media coverage (equal weight to consensus vs. contrarian scientists) and fake-expert arguments (using unqualified scientists to…
Spread & networksPlatforms, policy & society
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 ElectionAllcott and Gentzkov provide the first comprehensive empirical evidence on fake news exposure during the 2016 US election. Drawing on a curated database of 156 fake news articles, web traffic data, and a post-election survey of 1,200 adults, they estimate the average American saw and remembered 1.14 fake news articles during the election…