Skip to content

WhatsApp vigilantes: an exploration of citizen reception and circulation of WhatsApp misinformation linked to mob violence in India

Authors: Shakuntala Banaji, Ramnath Bhat, Anushi Agarwal, Nihal Passanha, Sadhana Pravin

Publication: London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Media and Communications, 2019

TL;DR

This LSE report examines how WhatsApp misinformation circulation in India relates to lynchings and mob violence since 2015. The study investigates citizen reception, technological affordances, motivations for sharing, and the broader socio-political context shaping how false information spreads through messaging platforms and triggers real-world harm.

Key claims

  • WhatsApp's encrypted, semi-private group structure enables rapid misinformation circulation with limited external oversight.
  • Misinformation shared on WhatsApp in India has been directly linked to mob violence and lynchings, particularly when targeting religious and caste minorities.
  • Citizen reception and amplification of misinformation is shaped by existing social divisions, media literacy gaps, and distrust of mainstream media.
  • The affordances of WhatsApp (end-to-end encryption, forward limits, group privacy, video/image sharing) interact with user behaviors and motivations in ways that differ from other platforms.
  • Policy and regulation responses to WhatsApp misinformation must account for local socio-political contexts and infrastructure constraints.

Scope and relevance

The report addresses the intersection of disinformation, fake news, propaganda, and real-world harms — specifically mob violence driven or amplified by false information. It connects technology use (WhatsApp's infrastructure and affordances) to media literacy, policy, and violence outcomes. The authors note relevance to other countries including the USA, Israel, Pakistan, Brazil, and Indonesia.

Connections

Notes

This is an LSE research report (not a peer-reviewed journal article), making it a primary qualitative/ethnographic study rather than a large-scale quantitative analysis. The focus on mob violence and real-world harm positions this work at the intersection of platform studies, media criticism, and public safety — critical for understanding how misinformation has consequences beyond discourse.