Skip to content

Coordinated inauthentic behavior

Organized campaigns by multiple accounts or operators to amplify messages, manipulate discourse, and influence online audiences.

Coordinated inauthentic behavior describes campaigns in which multiple accounts, often operated by the same actors or coordinated groups, work together to amplify content, manipulate algorithmic systems, and influence online discourse. These campaigns differ from organic user coordination in that they typically involve deceptive practices—fake personas, automated amplification, or deliberate persona networks designed to appear as grassroots activity while serving a centralized agenda.

Scope and forms

Coordinated campaigns take many forms: troll farms operating networks of accounts from a single location (e.g., Russian Internet Research Agency operations), distributed networks of sockpuppet accounts amplifying political messages, coordinated use of hashtags or talking points across inauthentic profiles, and platform-manipulating behavior like artificially inflating engagement metrics. Some campaigns target specific conversations (e.g., election discourse, social movements); others operate persistently to shape broader narrative landscapes.

The work may be operationalized as state-sponsored (foreign interference), commercial (reputation management, marketing), or grassroots-mimicking (activist campaigns using coordinated-but-authentic accounts). The distinction between authentic coordination and inauthentic manipulation is crucial: authentic grassroots movements coordinate naturally; inauthentic campaigns hide their coordination behind fake personas and false grassroots signals.

Key papers

Papers on this topic