Skip to content

Image and Visual Misinformation

Misinformation in image, video, and visual media form, including out-of-context images, photoshops, and synthetic media

False or misleading visual content including photographs, memes, screenshots, videos, and other images used to spread misinformation. This topic covers detection methods, typologies of visual misinformation (out-of-context images, photoshopped content, deepfakes, false captions), and platform-specific dynamics of visual content spread.

Taxonomy

Visual misinformation broadly falls into three categories:

  • Out-of-context images ("cheap fakes" or "shallow fakes") — real images presented without proper context or with misleading captions; often old content reshared during new events; low production cost but effective due to realism and plausibility.
  • Manipulated images — images altered through photoshop, color adjustment, cropping, or splicing; can range from benign humor to convincing fabrications (e.g., fake news screenshots).
  • Synthetic media — completely AI-generated or deepfake video/images that create false depictions of people or events.

Key videos

  • nodate-garimella-misinformation-whatsapp — Characterizes image-based misinformation on WhatsApp: 13% of shared images are misinformation across three categories: out-of-context images (40%), false quotes/statistics overlaid on images (30%), and photoshopped content (30%). Shows misinformation images persist far longer than other content (50% last over 100 days). Discusses detection and mitigation via perceptual hashing, machine learning, on-device fact-checking, and community-driven correction.
  • cheapfakes-synthetic-media — out-of-context and manipulated media
  • deepfakes — AI-generated synthetic video
  • multimodal-detection — methods for detecting misinformation across text and images
  • social-media-analysis — how visual content spreads on platforms

Papers on this topic